Brad Guth
2012-05-16 04:31:02 UTC
There’s no doubt that CFCs can reach the ozone layer, and along with
UV interact with O3, however as those CFCs tend to get nearly
cryogenic cold as would be necessary within those stratospheric polar
holes, they and other resulting molecular composites or molecular
derivatives such as heavy chlorine tend to fall back to Earth, whereas
helium remains inert and just slows down a little as it continually
migrates up and away from Earth and unavoidably gets picked by the
solar wind, that at times is considerable.
In other words, most of those natural and artificial CFCs do not
without assistance extensively linger within the nearly cryogenic (-85
C) polar ozone stratosphere, so they probably can not help to motivate
nor otherwise lubricate O3. The federal and somewhat international
enforced ban on CFCs (with exceptions of research, medical and
considerable military usage) has been extremely complex and spendy for
such an enforced policy that has provided damn little if any positive/
constructive impact towards reducing our polar ozone holes.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2089537/Ozone-hole-Arctic-actually-caused-COLD-weather.html
“Observations over the past thirty years indicate that the
stratosphere in cold Arctic winters cooled down by about 1°C per
decade on the average.”
There we have our objective proof of “global cooling”? (not hardly)
4He on the other hand does a really fine job of maintaining its
molecular integrity as it fluffs and lubricates O3 and continually
migrates upward without ever binding to nor becoming anything other
than 4He, unless ionized into a highly conducting plasma (aka
lightening) which even helps to generate O3. This ozone unbinding
seems problematic.
Of course continually wasting or rather the wholesale venting of CFCs,
as our military industrial complex had been doing for decades and is
still practicing, is never offering a good nor wholesome kind of
environmental outcome (though most of everything humans do has been
negatively impacting our environment). Therefore replacing CFCs with
alternatives that are way more spendy and in some instances worse for
the environment but getting far less wasted or wholesale vented
without any attempt at recycling is a perfectly good thing unless it’s
causing national debt, unemployment, foreclosures and essentially
taking our food, medical care and retirement off the table.
In other words, ozone holes are a bit more complex and linked to the
natural and artificial diffusion of 4He as the primary culprit, with
CFCs as a contributing factor. Perhaps solar wind ionized 4He is the
give and take method of both creating and extracting O3, and the net
result without the likes of hard science via OCO is making it so much
harder to objectively quantify.
As our planet runs low or essentially out of its geology stored
helium(4He), as well known by Big Oil and most other Big Energy
(including all those in the know within major industry and government
agencies that have been told to keep their educated mouths shut on
this one, or else they can kiss their reelections and/or appointments
of authority plus whatever grants and other funding goodbye. This way
the true skulduggery culprits can best manage to keep their loot and
authority over us, and continue to insider market trade, speculate and
hoard their hydrocarbons plus dominating other markets as they
maneuver their wealth and authority in order to take fullest advantage
of the rest of us once again after their gas and oil wells run dry and
we’re down to converting coal resources into spendy and otherwise
negative energy gas and oil hydrocarbons that’ll be even more spendy
once the all-inclusive tally is taken.
So, by no later than 2050 is when those ozone holes are going to close
for good, though not only because of CFC reductions but because of a
global lack of 4He that we haven’t developed any affordable
alternative for. In other words, this is another full blown ruse that
our Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters are pulling on us, as a grand sting
of global proportions and purely negative consequences for those of us
non-oligarchs, and of course it’s permitting further damage to the
global environment.
I’m not so much opposed to the following science interpretation, as
I’m merely favoring that helium plays a more important role that is
consistently involved with the demise of polar ozone.
http://www.meteoros.de/psc/psce.htm
“As long as the chloride exists as molecules, there is no ozone
decomposition. But as soon as the sun rises in the arctic spring, the
chloride molecules are dissociated by the ultraviolet radiation
(Lambda less than 450 nm), that means that they are split up into
chloride atoms of great reactivity. This sets free large amounts of
chloride atoms within a short time and starts an avalanche-like
decomposition of ozone which finally leads to the formation of the
ozone hole.
So the observation of NAT clouds allows a lot of conclusions on the
chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere. In the case of the
observation present the conditions of the stratosphere are documented
rather good and there are also some other observations of similar
cloud formations of that morning and the night before from
Scandinavia. So it is not improbable that it might have been the first
photographic documentation of NAT clouds in our latitudes.”
It’s quite conceivable that our planet has been gaining less than a
couple kg/sec, while otherwise losing more than a couple tonnes per
second (extensively due to our hydrocarbon extractions and otherwise
via natural diffusion of hydrogen and helium), and at some tipping
point this ongoing reduction in mass and its ozone depletion is going
to bite us in ways we haven’t even imagined. Reducing the mass of a
planet that’s only marginally balanced as is, can’t possibly be a good
thing.
Perhaps the Oligarch obfuscation policy of “don’t ask, don’t tell” and
denial of their being in denial is as good as it’s ever going to get,
and just as likely why they foiled our OCO mission, so that their
mining excavations, wellheads and those refinery vapors plus secondary
flaring that produces multiple carcinogens in addition to CO2, and
always their continuous release of helium are not given any public
awareness (much less published in any of our K12 textbooks).
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
UV interact with O3, however as those CFCs tend to get nearly
cryogenic cold as would be necessary within those stratospheric polar
holes, they and other resulting molecular composites or molecular
derivatives such as heavy chlorine tend to fall back to Earth, whereas
helium remains inert and just slows down a little as it continually
migrates up and away from Earth and unavoidably gets picked by the
solar wind, that at times is considerable.
In other words, most of those natural and artificial CFCs do not
without assistance extensively linger within the nearly cryogenic (-85
C) polar ozone stratosphere, so they probably can not help to motivate
nor otherwise lubricate O3. The federal and somewhat international
enforced ban on CFCs (with exceptions of research, medical and
considerable military usage) has been extremely complex and spendy for
such an enforced policy that has provided damn little if any positive/
constructive impact towards reducing our polar ozone holes.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2089537/Ozone-hole-Arctic-actually-caused-COLD-weather.html
“Observations over the past thirty years indicate that the
stratosphere in cold Arctic winters cooled down by about 1°C per
decade on the average.”
There we have our objective proof of “global cooling”? (not hardly)
4He on the other hand does a really fine job of maintaining its
molecular integrity as it fluffs and lubricates O3 and continually
migrates upward without ever binding to nor becoming anything other
than 4He, unless ionized into a highly conducting plasma (aka
lightening) which even helps to generate O3. This ozone unbinding
seems problematic.
Of course continually wasting or rather the wholesale venting of CFCs,
as our military industrial complex had been doing for decades and is
still practicing, is never offering a good nor wholesome kind of
environmental outcome (though most of everything humans do has been
negatively impacting our environment). Therefore replacing CFCs with
alternatives that are way more spendy and in some instances worse for
the environment but getting far less wasted or wholesale vented
without any attempt at recycling is a perfectly good thing unless it’s
causing national debt, unemployment, foreclosures and essentially
taking our food, medical care and retirement off the table.
In other words, ozone holes are a bit more complex and linked to the
natural and artificial diffusion of 4He as the primary culprit, with
CFCs as a contributing factor. Perhaps solar wind ionized 4He is the
give and take method of both creating and extracting O3, and the net
result without the likes of hard science via OCO is making it so much
harder to objectively quantify.
As our planet runs low or essentially out of its geology stored
helium(4He), as well known by Big Oil and most other Big Energy
(including all those in the know within major industry and government
agencies that have been told to keep their educated mouths shut on
this one, or else they can kiss their reelections and/or appointments
of authority plus whatever grants and other funding goodbye. This way
the true skulduggery culprits can best manage to keep their loot and
authority over us, and continue to insider market trade, speculate and
hoard their hydrocarbons plus dominating other markets as they
maneuver their wealth and authority in order to take fullest advantage
of the rest of us once again after their gas and oil wells run dry and
we’re down to converting coal resources into spendy and otherwise
negative energy gas and oil hydrocarbons that’ll be even more spendy
once the all-inclusive tally is taken.
So, by no later than 2050 is when those ozone holes are going to close
for good, though not only because of CFC reductions but because of a
global lack of 4He that we haven’t developed any affordable
alternative for. In other words, this is another full blown ruse that
our Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters are pulling on us, as a grand sting
of global proportions and purely negative consequences for those of us
non-oligarchs, and of course it’s permitting further damage to the
global environment.
I’m not so much opposed to the following science interpretation, as
I’m merely favoring that helium plays a more important role that is
consistently involved with the demise of polar ozone.
http://www.meteoros.de/psc/psce.htm
“As long as the chloride exists as molecules, there is no ozone
decomposition. But as soon as the sun rises in the arctic spring, the
chloride molecules are dissociated by the ultraviolet radiation
(Lambda less than 450 nm), that means that they are split up into
chloride atoms of great reactivity. This sets free large amounts of
chloride atoms within a short time and starts an avalanche-like
decomposition of ozone which finally leads to the formation of the
ozone hole.
So the observation of NAT clouds allows a lot of conclusions on the
chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere. In the case of the
observation present the conditions of the stratosphere are documented
rather good and there are also some other observations of similar
cloud formations of that morning and the night before from
Scandinavia. So it is not improbable that it might have been the first
photographic documentation of NAT clouds in our latitudes.”
It’s quite conceivable that our planet has been gaining less than a
couple kg/sec, while otherwise losing more than a couple tonnes per
second (extensively due to our hydrocarbon extractions and otherwise
via natural diffusion of hydrogen and helium), and at some tipping
point this ongoing reduction in mass and its ozone depletion is going
to bite us in ways we haven’t even imagined. Reducing the mass of a
planet that’s only marginally balanced as is, can’t possibly be a good
thing.
Perhaps the Oligarch obfuscation policy of “don’t ask, don’t tell” and
denial of their being in denial is as good as it’s ever going to get,
and just as likely why they foiled our OCO mission, so that their
mining excavations, wellheads and those refinery vapors plus secondary
flaring that produces multiple carcinogens in addition to CO2, and
always their continuous release of helium are not given any public
awareness (much less published in any of our K12 textbooks).
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Helping Earth lose mass and creating those larger ozone holes, is not
nearly as hard as it looks. And by the way, notice how all the usual
mainstream spooks, moles and FUD-masters are leaving this topic alone.
Here’s a little more information, as to our Earth losing mass as great
as 1000:1 faster than it gains mass from dust/meteor influx, although
a hundred to one should be seriously impressive enough. Doing this
mass reduction via natural gas purge and from the core production of
its helium along with its natural diffusion process, plus commercially
releasing any residuals of trapped helium that’s also going away
forever, of which we can probably sustain this method for perhaps at
least another decade.
Here are some topic considerations as subtopics for those of you that
still think you have an open mind.
A little further info about our government that intentionally never
lies or obfuscates: (supposedly not here in the US of A, but it could
happen)
Natural gas feedstock that isn’t quite as pure and environmentally
CH4 $2.40/1000 scf, because that’s about all the cheap hydrocarbons we
Natural plus artificial gas venting that has been doing us more harm
than good.
Ozone holes that are not just CFC derived, but could and have been
The hydrocarbon wars, and other resources that are getting too scarce
Always our physically dark and metallicity reactive moon, that’s
Venus, the extremely nearby forbidden planet, that only works for
-
Honest government plus hydrocarbon alternatives = unhappy Oligarchs
and mostly cranky white Semites going kind of postal on us. Now that
our whimsy government of Oligarch puppets can’t officially and/or
intentionally insider trade and openly exploit us for every last
nickel and dime, and supposedly others of sufficient Oligarch and
Semite mafia status with authority above whomever we elect or appoint
(such as our red-flag colorblind SEC and Federal Reserve that get to
do as they please), are still not supposed to do insider trading and/
or market manipulations to their own benefit, whereas instead they’ll
have to find new and improved mafia and sneaky faith-based ways of
screwing us over, such as via sophisticated offshore robotrading using
vapor accounts and their proven “pump and dump” methods, plus profit
kiting that always works to avoid their having to pay taxes on those
billions in skimmed profits that our SEC as having insured their
partners in crimes against humanity could be taken from us (which they
in fact did, and our president plus any of his executive authority
still can’t seem to do a damn thing about any of it, even though it’s
potentially treasonous and even indirectly terrorist worthy because
that loot gets to be spent without any DHS oversight).
Just wondering; what exactly are the top 0.1% actually doing for us,
and not against us? (actually it’s the top .0001% we most need to
oversee and appropriately deal with, because those of the top .1% are
just regular brown-nosed clowns and minions to these upper caste
Oligarch Rothschilds)
With a great deal of our human assistance and persistence, plus our
usual arrogance or mainstream ruse and FUD about never running out of
anything or anyone to exploit: At least if you’re an upper caste
Oligarch, it’s all good (sort of).
Will guess what folks; Earth may be running out of helium a little
sooner than we’ve been lead to believe, and that in of itself is a
perfectly good reason to look off-world for other resources of 4He and
3He, not to mention the much greater value of using 3He for just about
everything (including fusion energy). In other words, by the time
we’re running on the very dregs of our hydrocarbon fumes and still not
being allowed to use thorium fueled reactors, and perhaps badly in
need of that 3He fusion energy worse than ever, we’ll be sh*t out of
luck unless we can artificially and affordably create such volumes of
those nifty elements of helium on demand.
Helium is supposedly a very 26% common element in the initial universe
(perhaps rated as a couple some odd percent somewhat less common
nowadays), but otherwise it remains a rare terrestrial element that’s
very slow to reproduce via the radioactive decay of thorium and
uranium that’s supposedly giving us only 3e6 kg/year, and yet each and
every molecule of it comes with its very own one way ticket plus
unlimited frequent flyer miles, because once created and shed outside
of our extremely thin lithosphere, a storage tank, LHC, blimps or from
party balloons is where it doesn’t bind with anything or otherwise get
recycled, as well as once created by the slow radioactive decay
process and eventually released via natural geology osmosis/diffusion
or artificially purged from within by drilling and fracking it out,
it’s going to leave Earth in its molecular dust (so to speak). The
crust of Earth is basically acting as a molecular sieve that’s just
porous enough that it allows our atmosphere to be sustained with a
sufficient complexity of gasses, plus getting a sufficiently
replenished volume of helium in order to maintain 5.24 ppm
(conceivably 1.6e11 kg) within our atmosphere. One trustworthy method
of its natural plus artificial escapement is via natural gas that’s
never pure CH4 to begin with.
2012/2013 Global natural/raw gas extractions of roughly 129e12 cf =
3.65e12 m3 per year (US responsible for taking at least 20% of that,
mostly because of our oil refineries processing imported oil and
exporting their refined liquid hydrocarbon products and otherwise via
large scale gas turbines and boiler kinds of heat and power
generation, plus our having the world’s largest military industrial
complex that doesn’t always have to account for its all-inclusive
consumption nor environmental impact), is not necessarily including
those hydrocarbons required for global exploration and the ongoing
wellhead plus various pipeline and tanker transport related
consumptions, its necessary processing in order to rid this raw
natural gas feedstock of certain unworthy combustion and/or toxic
elements, plus taking into account for its vast redistribution related
consumptions, much less accounting for those raw oil and gas wellhead
flarings and just good old industry leakage, spillage and those peaky
mega-blowouts continually taking place, whereas if this were all
combined (including negative energy production) could easily increase
that global volume of raw gas extractions to at least 5e12 m3/yr,
whereas perhaps 75% of that (3.75e12 m3/yr) is the refined metered
consumption of CH4, of which the US takes a 7.6e11 m3 or 20% bite.
Wholesale extractions of crude oil from sand is offering a perfectly
good example of negative energy, whereas it’s taking more hydrocarbons
and creating a much greater carbon footprint via massive volumes of
consuming raw natural gas, plus demanding a few other forms of applied
energy, in order to forcibly excavate, transport and processing that
oily sand for its liquid hydrocarbon energy, that eventually becomes
consumer fuels. But that’s just another ongoing mainstream
obfuscation par for the course that has run itself out of most of
those other more affordable or cleaner options. Otherwise, I’ll
suggest that some of this bulk natural gas feedstock isn’t exactly
getting metered nor hardly processed, but instead directly consumed
for running local power plants or piped for other dedicated industrial
mass consumption, because most in Big Energy or heavy industry really
don’t care how extra nasty, toxic or less combustion efficient it is
(as long as it’s offering the cheapest energy alternative, such as its
current market trading under $2.40 per 1000 cf which only slightly
modifies our residential end-use 500% markup price that was always
artificially jacked up to begin with, not to mention those substantial
up-front investments by each commercial and residential client to
begin with, nor their added CO2, CO, NOx, fire and explosive risk
factors within your home, office, factories and schools).
60% efficient fuel-cells running off CH4 and/or H2 could totally
mitigate the residential natural gas related CO2, CO, NOx, fire and
those not so uncommon explosion risk factors, but otherwise those fuel-
cells are apparently too failsafe, operate too clean or even too
cheaply and potentially as carbon free when fueled by H2, and
obviously they’re rather efficient compared to other commercial energy
alternatives, thus most communities still don’t have that option but
otherwise get to pay nearly ten fold as much as they should for their
electrical grid energy.
The recently foiled OCO mission would have extensively identified and
quantified natural and artificial vapors of various elements, plus
mapping and quantifying any natural or artificial heat related issues,
to a sufficient global mapping detail of resolution that for the first
time we’d have some objective clues as to the extent of what humans
contribute in addition to whatever’s naturally taking place. So for
now and just to be on the safe all-inclusive estimate side of what
gross amount of hydrocarbon saturated gasses are taken out and/or
simply getting exposed from within and frequently allowed as
unrestricted to vent (2012 industry flaring/venting estimate 2e11 m3/
year), perhaps we should specify 1e13 m3/yr, because the metered and
unmetered world consumption of CH4(methane) is not ever the same thing
as what those volumes of raw wellhead feedstock and many other
artificially released volumes manage to contribute to our global
atmospheric environment, in addition to whatever occurs by natural
upwelling and geology osmosis or nanofiltration (after all, the thin
crust of Earth is nothing but a natural molecular sieve, along with
having thousands of significant big holes).
Typically our oil and gas wells can be worthy of 90+% CH4, but along
with including those gassy deep oil wells and various exposures via
mining plus extensive shale fracking could easily pull that well
average below 75% CH4, and some of that natural gas is actually quite
sour or acidic and corrosive by packing CO2 that’s entirely toxic to
begin with, plus it often includes greater than trace amounts of known
carcinogens and other toxins, including a small portion of radon gas
and perhaps averaging as great as 1% helium (mostly 4He plus extremely
little 3He) per given volume of this raw natural gas. BPs Prudhoe Bay
natural gas composition is only worth 76% CH4, 12% CO2 (acid gas), and
that percentage of CH4 will only degrade over time (for the moment
they only burn this raw feedstock locally for their own wellhead and
piping energy needs, and otherwise having to forcibly pump it back
underground in order to store it and help extract their $60+/barrel of
wellhead crude oil)
Natural gas at 1% 4He, and that’s only putting us within the ballpark
of releasing 1.8e10 kg of helium per year in addition to whatever is
naturally leaking out of Earth, and that’s only contributing another
5708 kg/sec to what nature likely has to spew or vent near that much
in order to sustain the 5.24 ppm (atomic) or .017 ppm per atmospheric
volume, which is no small accomplishment of natural 4He upwelling
leakage or diffusion all by itself. An atmospheric volume of 100 km x
5.2e14 m2 = 5.2e19 m3, and supposedly 1.7e-8 of that is 8.84e11 m3 of
4He = 1.6e11 kg that has to get replenished via 5073 kg/sec when based
upon an annual renewal basis, though its rate of renewal is probably a
somewhat greater.
That’s derived from a maximum diffusion and escapement rate as based
upon 1% 4He as found within natural gas, whereas a more conservative
0.1% per CH4 volume is still a very significant quantity of 4He
escapement (1.8e9 kg/year), and once again the OCO mission would have
made this task of quantifying so much easier and a whole lot more
objectively proven.
Geothermal and hydrothermal vents that happen to spew a great deal of
4He in spurts or waves of 11% concentration in regular geyser like
spurts or cycles is what has objectively proven that this element of
4He doesn’t exactly stick around or otherwise bind or cling with
anything in order to keep itself from leaving Earth.
http://www.geothermal-energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/WGC/2000/R0069.PDF
The unusual Nagqu W geothermal vent with its considerable 4He and
3He, is clearly suggesting a substantial nearby cache of radium. Even
the surrounding soil samples offer 100 ppm 4He that’s obviously
migrating as a constant upwelling or diffusion from deeper within.http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/ivone/ftp/Tibet/References/Hoke_et_al._EPSL...
Once raw helium gets released it probably can’t ever exceed .98 m/sec
unless there’s some artificial kinetic and/or thermodynamic energy
applied or it’s contained within a balloon that can exceed 4 m/sec
(faster than 5.5 m/sec with minimal payload), although for raw 4He
averaging just .01 m/sec = 1e7 seconds to reach 100 km, is only
taking .3171 year. In other words, an average vertical migration of .
0032 m/sec would take roughly one year to reach 100 km. However, due
to molecular turbulence caused by various atomic molecular
differentials of our atmospheric elements, whereas the typical
vertical migration rate of raw 4He within a sea level atmosphere,
managed to rise at up to .75 m/sec and otherwise averaging .65 m/sec,
has been objectively proven.
http://www.orau.gov/ssaa2012/presentations/Thursday%20AM%20Materials/...
http://endeavours.org/Events/BalloonFest2012/Documents/Balloon%20Rise...
In other words, there’s nothing of known physics that’s going to keep
that helium from leaving Earth, and perhaps taking a quicker exit than
one year to accomplish.
Perhaps all the natural plus our artificial release of helium could
exceed 10 tonnes/sec or amounting to only 5 tonnes/sec if the
atmospheric volume and its subsequent mass has been increasing,
however, unless that volume and the subsequent mass of our exosphere
has been measurably expanding (which it probably hasn’t), Earth is
losing mass.
However, helium plus a few other lofty elements (including H2 and our
O3/ozone) are leaving our world at that or somewhat greater rate due
to whatever the thermodynamics, molecular buoyancy and what solar wind
can manage to heat, accelerate and excavate away, and as for perhaps
blaming those increasing ozone holes on CFCs like freon-12/R12
(Difluorodichloromethane) was perhaps just another spendy oligarch FUD/
ruse in order to distract us and cover the fact that helium was always
insider known as the primary volumetric culprit, as well as to
otherwise greatly profit from those of us that could least afford to
pay. A mafia would call that a sting.
Difluorodichloromethane/R12 itself was essentially ozone inert because
the lower atmospheric concentrations of this molecular element wasn’t
ever capable of leaving our planet (any more so than Corexit or any
number of natural freons including CH4 can’t easily escape), but none
the less those opening ozone holes were always mainstream depicted as
intentionally quite scary and otherwise perfectly FUD worthy for
accommodating and promoting this FUD ruse of CFCs being the cause.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion
Or if you like to explicitly trust your government and their Oligarch
plus Semite friends to be always telling us the whole truth and
nothing but the truth, then in that always warm and fuzzy failsafe
case, you’re all set to go as is, and you should remain as a happy
camper to the very end, regardless of whatever anyone else has to
say. If any of that sounded condescending or derogatory, it was
purely intentional.
-
Without those volumes of much cheaper and better performing R12 plus a
few other disqualified CFCs (such as used for dry cleaning), those
polar ozone holes are still every bit as big and if anything looking
substantially worse than ever.
Atomic halogens do not auto-mutate, decay or otherwise magically
convert into helium or anything remotely close that that kind of low
molecular density. If anything depletes, displaces and/or dilutes
that protective ozone layer, it’s those considerable volumes of
natural plus artificially released helium that briefly lingers within
the colder regions of our upper atmosphere (aka polar regions) before
entirely leaving our world. As helium unavoidably migrates upwards
and the solar wind plus solar heating accelerates this process, it
tends to lubricate as well as draw or draft along with it some of the
O3(ozone), as though it’s somewhat acting as a molecular lubricant
because of its smaller radii and nothing directly or indirectly binds
with helium. From the efficient station-keeping and otherwise ideal
scientific location of our Earth-moon L1, this badly needed Earth
science of what’s leaving our planet could have been ideally
researched and fully quantified in addition to many other GW+AGW
factors getting better understood.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/environment/ozonefreon_fraud.htm
Clearly we have government agencies operating and continually
obfuscating under the controls of certain oligarchs, as financed by
the likes of Rothschilds, which gives Semites and certain others
special benefits by protecting their global markets. In my view these
public-funded agencies should be abolished and later collectively
restarted as run by those few we can trust, required to maintain at
least 50% independent research as having absolutely no ties to those
of Big Energy or Heavy Industry that extracts and consumes massive
volumes of hydrocarbons, because we obviously can’t trust these folks
and their financial backers to be telling us the whole truth and
nothing but the truth about their own all-inclusive carbon footprints.
Unlike lofty and/or flighty elements like hydrogen and especially
helium that doesn’t bind with anything (including itself), the
geothermal and artificial wellhead vented mass that’s radon isn’t ever
going away, and because of its atomic molecular density plus its
relatively short half-life decay process means that it’ll quickly
convert into lead (perfectly safe when kept deep underground, though
not so safe above ground or much less in the ground water that we have
to consume). Recent natural gas via fracking is greatly increasing
the metallicity toxins in our ground water, including radium and its
radon that’s potentially more lethal per mg than Polonium 210.
http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/jun252002/1423.pdf
The Bakreshwar site with its 4% He isn’t offering the highest Ra,
whereas the Swastik Burtu, Gangtok site being more than 12 fold
greater Ra is sitting on a pile of radium plus any number of other
fission elements (including thorium).
The old adage about our planet only gaining mass is a lot of
mainstream FUD suggesting 40~70e3 tonnes/yr, that’s a ruse continually
perpetrated upon us, as though it’s offering some objective truth,
though perhaps because it also covers a great many Big Energy butts.
One example of FUD in “Physics Forums” via contributor “DaveC426913”
cranked up that global influx tonnage to an impressive 160,000 tonnes/
year (5 kg/sec) without even vaguely cracking a smile or so much as
offering a smirk, by posting this “Michael Paine” link.
http://users.tpg.com.au/users/horsts/transpermia.html
Oddly our naked and physically dark plus paramagnetic basalt crusted
moon seems near 99.9% devoid of such physical influx, because via our
NASA/Apollo era it can’t even account for its own volumes of crater
displaced dust and impactor shards that are apparently quite few and
far between, as well as our Apollo guys with all of their “right
stuff” finding its surface as perfectly crystal dry, inert and rather
devoid of lose material plus otherwise of mostly soft and highly
monochromatic pastel grayish hues offering no significant metallicity
whatsoever (not even sodium), but oddly this was quite reflective to
the tune of 65+% for as far as their cameras and unfiltered lens could
record, and otherwise perfectly harmless as well as lacking any
significant local radiation and much less as hardly paramagnetic nor
was it getting illuminated by any UV saturation, X-rays nor even the
least bit gamma worthy, and as I’d previously noted there was not even
any significant hint of sodium (even though we’ve since discovered the
moon is actually surrounded by a substantial ionized cloud of sodium,
as well as being extensively UV illuminated plus reacting quite nicely
to X-rays and gamma). In other words, our NASA/Apollo era of moon
science doesn’t seem to add up, and none of their Kodak recoded
science can be trusted or much less independently forensic
substantiated.
The quantifying science of any hard objective numbers as to what sort
and volume of items on average contributes annually to the mass of
Earth is actually published in mainstream media and throughout
textbooks allover the place, and yet they seldom other than plagiarize
or copy-cat agree, perhaps because there is no actual objective
scientific accounting for this molecular influx, just like there’s
still no objective science pertaining to how long a m3 of raw/naked
ice placed in LEO or Earth-moon L1 space would last within such a hard
vacuum while illuminated via the 1 AU of solar influx.
Of course, once the lighter elements of our planet are depleted and/or
intentionally released to get taken away by the solar wind (GW and AGW
making that molecular exit process even more efficient), the ongoing
loss of mass will eventually have to revert to a collection or buildup
phase of gaining mass from the influx of dust, meteor rocks and those
heavier molecular particles, whereas dust and metallicity from those
hopefully few larger items like icy ELE asteroids, that which the
local thermodynamics plus aerodynamics of their buoyancy and our local
gravity can manage to forever hold onto. Ideally if nothing of
atmospheric gasses was any lighter than N2, we’d be all set for the
long-haul in spite of our protective geomagnetic force field that’s
failing us by .1%/year.
Here’s one somewhat recent research as to the loss of oxygen ions, and
it’s still ongoing because O3 and lighter elements simply don’t have
sufficient molecular mass to stick with the weak gravity of Earth
(especially at risk of outgoing when our sun is behaving ever so
http://thayer.dartmouth.edu/spacescience/wl/misc/Outflow/Seki%2001.pdf
Of no great surprise, without those CFCs and a few other NO FLY
molecules, it seems the ozone holes are as bad or worse than ever.
It’s as though we’re on a hydrocarbon binging roll, especially with
natural gas which unavoidably includes the release of those extra
volumes of helium, as though directly correlating to our global
exploiting of hydrocarbons and the releasing of those unwanted
elements. This is not to say that CFCs haven’t been a minor
contributing factor.
http://www.theozonehole.com/2011.htm
-
Are we running on fumes yet, or is it looking a tad bit worse?
Here’s a few optimistic researchers suggesting we got perhaps another
30 years worth of relatively cheap helium. In other words, peak-
helium may be a lot closer than we’ve been lead to believe, and after
that it’s going to seriously cost big bucks to fill up that party
balloon.http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/08/25/nobel-prize-winn...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1305386/Earths-helium-...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubbert_peak_theory
“Almost all helium on Earth is a result of radioactive decay of
uranium and thorium. Helium is extracted by fractional distillation
from natural gas, which contains up to 7% helium. The world's largest
helium-rich natural gas fields are found in the United States,
especially in the Hugoton and nearby gas fields in Kansas, Oklahoma,
and Texas. The extracted helium is stored underground in the National
Helium Reserve near Amarillo, Texas, the self-proclaimed "Helium
Capital of the World". Helium production is expected to decline along
with natural gas production in these areas.”
Actually, India seems to have way more than it’s fair share of
naturally vented helium, and its volumetric outflux from those natural
plus artificial geothermal vents is truly considerable, plus otherwise
extracted liquids including water wells and natural aquifers of ground
water caries or rather helps transport helium to the surface, in that
basically all liquid extractions and even solids of coal or hard-rock
excavations contributes to this artificial and thus accelerated
release of helium. So it’s not just a natural gas associated issue.
“Helium is the second-lightest chemical element in the Universe,
causing it to rise to the upper layers of Earth's atmosphere. Helium
atoms are so light that the Earth's gravity field is simply not strong
enough to trap helium in the atmosphere and it dissipates slowly into
space and is lost forever.”
Nowadays our Big Energy oligarch cartels and their very brown-nosed
associate mafia cabals of market insiders speculating us to death and/
or putting us into the nearest poor-house via global inflation that’s
directly hydrocarbon price related, are now into drilling and fracking
so wide and deep that most of what’s coming from their wells is
somewhat lower-grade or sour and otherwise increasingly toxic natural
gas, as having ever decreasing percentages of CH4(methane) which
requires increasing amounts of having to process before sending it on
its way to consumers. The energy demand for this kind of added
hydrocarbon exploitation and its processing is also increasing to the
point of negative energy and maximum pollution, not to mention its
unavoidable release of helium along with other elements they usually
care not to mention. Shale gas is essentially the most spendy source
of natural gas (much like oily sand is the most spendy and carbon
producing resource of crude oil), and its feedstock will involve the
most kinds of complex other elements that’ll have to get processed
out, whereas a good Big Energy policy is becoming “don’t ask, don’t
tell” (aka mum’s the word).
http://www.3legsresources.com/media/A%20guide%20to%20shale%20gas.pdf
The injected water is essentially toxic or at the very least
unsuitable for most all known forms of life (especially as it returns
to the surface), not to mention those heavy metallicity elements freed
by fracking that to go with the flow of any injected or as having
migrated into nearby groundwater. Gee whiz, what could possibly go
wrong?
Of course our public-funded mainstream oligarchs and their Rothschild
financers that always have wealth and authority over whomever we care
to elect or appoint, could care less how much this hydrocarbon binging
and helium loss fiasco could cost us or impact the environment by
polluting our above and below surface plus traumatizing whatever ocean
ecosystems, because they’ll never have to suffer or having to pay for
any of the negative consequences or least of all fret over global
inflation. Fortunately for mother nature, eventually those natural
reserves of helium will get depleted and only the gradual radioisotope
decay produced helium will be available (though spendy as hell), so
the amount of future mass loss should greatly subside, at least down
to some dull roar of supposedly making due with 3.2e6 kg/year (though
I’d argue its production via natural radioactive decay and internal
fission is worth 3.2e7 kg/year, because I believe that’s roughly what
it takes for sustaining 5.24 ppm based upon its annual replenishment),
that we can all learn from and/or adapt ourselves to live with much
less helium than 0.1% of the 3.2e8 kg/year that’ll likely be needed by
2020 (not to mention the considerably more nifty and valuable 3He),
that is unless WW3 and WW4 (fought mostly over those remaining
hydrocarbons) eliminates us first. Some research has been suggesting
an empty He tank within 30 years, although I’d stretch that one out to
at most 100 years because of new and improved technology that’ll get
utilized for exploiting and extracting it, and naturally it’ll get
real spendy because thus far we have nothing in physics for its
replacement. Of course, as is more than 99% of the artificially
accessible 4He has been systematically and systemically wasted, and
our “no child left behind” policy has created generations of K12s that
frankly don’t seem to have a clue as to how totally screwed they and
future generations are.
http://eolus.phys.northwestern.edu/CM_Theory_Group/Photos/Pages/QFS20...
Atmosphere deficient moons and asteroids would likely offer the most
concentrations of 3He, and some of those of sufficient metallicity
could even be creating their internal cache of 4He, and the planet
Mercury should offer a treasure trove of 3He in addition to its
considerable metallicity, whereas Venus with it terrifically
protective atmosphere of carbonated vapor may offer hardly any 3He.
-
So here’s the latest ongoing kicker in the mainstream butt of life as
we know it, in that only a few others (including myself) would dare to
suggest otherwise against this mainstream status quo, by having
suggested that our planet has actually been losing mass considerably
faster than whatever solar system and cosmic influx could possibly
contribute. Obviously the oligarchs and Rothschilds of Big Energy and
otherwise in charge of most public credit for financing our personal,
local and national debts, as such don’t seem to appreciate this
deductive interpretation of our planet losing mass. Sorry about that.
Do these mainstream Oligarchs and wise old Semites in charge of most
everything know what they’re doing to us and our global environment;
you can safely bet your bottom dollar they do understand those highly
profitable benefits and they understand those subsequent consequences
that the rest of us get to deal with, and our always having to pay for
no matters how many generations it takes. Is this a fair deal that we
and the next generations can afford to live with?
No doubt the innards of Earth has a lot more ongoing fission (perhaps
mostly via thorium), and thus we’ve got enough thorium, uranium and
radium offering more fission and decay produced heat plus helium than
most of us might care to accept (3.2e7 kg/yr), because it actually
takes quite a bit of 4He in order to sustain the 5.24 ppm of common
atmospheric concentration. Not so oddly, the very active geology of
Venus is also keeping up with replenishing those same continual solar
wind extracted elements, and yet it’s also cooling itself off at the
same time, while sustaining 12 ppm helium within its impressive
4.85e20 kg of a mostly CO2 atmosphere that’s offering 66 kg/m3 near
surface buoyancy, is by itself rather impressive for such a toasty
planet with a gravity of only 90.4% and offering loads of local
geothermal differentials to work with, but having no actual protective
geomagnetosphere other than solar wind generated, is why that solar
wind keeps taking atmospheric mass away from Venus as it cools off and
having to maintain those 12 ppm of 4He might demand an internal rate
of annual replenishment worth at least 1e9 kg/year.
http://syzygyastro.hubpages.com/hub/Understanding-Magnetism
The best interpretation of Venus lacking a geomagnetosphere is that
its iron core is simply too fluid, as perhaps hosting a lot more
thorium and uranium fission and/or it’s simply not as old as we
think. Either way that’s a darn good thing if one was seriously out
and about looking for the most accessible off-world resources (other
than our moon) to exploit for our needs, whereas at least a couple of
such needs are going to become those nifty elements of 4He and 3He as
our terrestrial cache slides well past peak-helium in the near
future. Of course at less than $6/m3 for the spot market of bulk
Grade-A(99.95% 4He) version isn’t all that spendy until the usual
distribution repackaging with its nominal 2000% (twenty fold) retail
markup gets us to pay $120/m3 (w/disposable tank), and otherwise we’re
talking of forking out only $1M/m3 for that of pure 3He is already
pushing the upper most market price so that only the rich and powerful
get access, and of course the rest of us are the ones that’ll always
get to pay for whatever these oligarchs care to spend our hard earned
loot on, because they’ll never have to spend, invest or otherwise risk
any of their unearned own loot.
Besides the physically dark surface of our naked moon hosting more
than its fair share of 3He (no doubt offering some internal
radioactive decay derived 4He), Venus should represent a true mother
lode of 4He in addition to a treasure trove of many other valuable
elements. This off-world cache of helium may initially be spendy as
hell to obtain, but so will terrestrial helium become a whole lot more
spendy as the dregs of hydrocarbons and internal radioactive decay
source simply isn’t capable of supplying 0.1% of our needs, could be
highly problematic.
The good news is that with a future of limited hydrocarbons and hardly
any spare helium to blow, those polar ozone holes should subside, thus
closing up and better protecting us from our sun that’s not exactly
behaving itself.
-
As we rapidly deplete our commercial stockpiles and continually vent
the internal cache of our natural gas and its helium within our
planet, it seems Venus actually has more helium(4He) than it knows
what to do with (it’s estimated that our moon can easily supply a
thousand years worth of 3He), and meanwhile our planet is clearly
about to run out of those before 2050, not to mention the ongoing
extractions of hydrocarbon isn't without further risk and spendy
consequences (including environmental and ecological disasters, wars,
pandemics, famine and the social/political demise of those less
fortunate or simply unable to bully their way along). Unfortunately,
it’s the primary job of our public media army of brown-nosed clowns
and FUD-masters to make this and any other independent investigative
research all go away, and they accomplish this job by topic/author
stalking and discrediting anyone that has any possible disagreements
or offers alternative science interpretations against those of the
mainstream status quo.
Guess what: NASA is now down to a pathetic fraction of what it could
have been, and to no surprise those Oligarch Rothschilds seem to like
it that way, because the last thing they want to see is private
enterprise going after the exploitation of off-world resources before
every last drop and cubic meter of their terrestrial resources are
pillaged and plundered for the highest price and drop of blood they
can squeeze out of us.
Our initial DARPA of Zionist Nazi Oligarchs and their Rothschild
bankers that supposedly got us safely to/from our moon, always think
everything is going perfectly fine and dandy, whereas even nowadays
those of DARPA are treated as extra special and always given public-
funded media hype whenever possible, so there’s never any need for
change or revisions, and otherwise it seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint anyway. So why change their system, should they risk being
voted out of office?
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
nearly as hard as it looks. And by the way, notice how all the usual
mainstream spooks, moles and FUD-masters are leaving this topic alone.
Here’s a little more information, as to our Earth losing mass as great
as 1000:1 faster than it gains mass from dust/meteor influx, although
a hundred to one should be seriously impressive enough. Doing this
mass reduction via natural gas purge and from the core production of
its helium along with its natural diffusion process, plus commercially
releasing any residuals of trapped helium that’s also going away
forever, of which we can probably sustain this method for perhaps at
least another decade.
Here are some topic considerations as subtopics for those of you that
still think you have an open mind.
A little further info about our government that intentionally never
lies or obfuscates: (supposedly not here in the US of A, but it could
happen)
Natural gas feedstock that isn’t quite as pure and environmentally
CH4 $2.40/1000 scf, because that’s about all the cheap hydrocarbons we
Natural plus artificial gas venting that has been doing us more harm
than good.
Ozone holes that are not just CFC derived, but could and have been
The hydrocarbon wars, and other resources that are getting too scarce
Always our physically dark and metallicity reactive moon, that’s
Venus, the extremely nearby forbidden planet, that only works for
-
Honest government plus hydrocarbon alternatives = unhappy Oligarchs
and mostly cranky white Semites going kind of postal on us. Now that
our whimsy government of Oligarch puppets can’t officially and/or
intentionally insider trade and openly exploit us for every last
nickel and dime, and supposedly others of sufficient Oligarch and
Semite mafia status with authority above whomever we elect or appoint
(such as our red-flag colorblind SEC and Federal Reserve that get to
do as they please), are still not supposed to do insider trading and/
or market manipulations to their own benefit, whereas instead they’ll
have to find new and improved mafia and sneaky faith-based ways of
screwing us over, such as via sophisticated offshore robotrading using
vapor accounts and their proven “pump and dump” methods, plus profit
kiting that always works to avoid their having to pay taxes on those
billions in skimmed profits that our SEC as having insured their
partners in crimes against humanity could be taken from us (which they
in fact did, and our president plus any of his executive authority
still can’t seem to do a damn thing about any of it, even though it’s
potentially treasonous and even indirectly terrorist worthy because
that loot gets to be spent without any DHS oversight).
Just wondering; what exactly are the top 0.1% actually doing for us,
and not against us? (actually it’s the top .0001% we most need to
oversee and appropriately deal with, because those of the top .1% are
just regular brown-nosed clowns and minions to these upper caste
Oligarch Rothschilds)
With a great deal of our human assistance and persistence, plus our
usual arrogance or mainstream ruse and FUD about never running out of
anything or anyone to exploit: At least if you’re an upper caste
Oligarch, it’s all good (sort of).
Will guess what folks; Earth may be running out of helium a little
sooner than we’ve been lead to believe, and that in of itself is a
perfectly good reason to look off-world for other resources of 4He and
3He, not to mention the much greater value of using 3He for just about
everything (including fusion energy). In other words, by the time
we’re running on the very dregs of our hydrocarbon fumes and still not
being allowed to use thorium fueled reactors, and perhaps badly in
need of that 3He fusion energy worse than ever, we’ll be sh*t out of
luck unless we can artificially and affordably create such volumes of
those nifty elements of helium on demand.
Helium is supposedly a very 26% common element in the initial universe
(perhaps rated as a couple some odd percent somewhat less common
nowadays), but otherwise it remains a rare terrestrial element that’s
very slow to reproduce via the radioactive decay of thorium and
uranium that’s supposedly giving us only 3e6 kg/year, and yet each and
every molecule of it comes with its very own one way ticket plus
unlimited frequent flyer miles, because once created and shed outside
of our extremely thin lithosphere, a storage tank, LHC, blimps or from
party balloons is where it doesn’t bind with anything or otherwise get
recycled, as well as once created by the slow radioactive decay
process and eventually released via natural geology osmosis/diffusion
or artificially purged from within by drilling and fracking it out,
it’s going to leave Earth in its molecular dust (so to speak). The
crust of Earth is basically acting as a molecular sieve that’s just
porous enough that it allows our atmosphere to be sustained with a
sufficient complexity of gasses, plus getting a sufficiently
replenished volume of helium in order to maintain 5.24 ppm
(conceivably 1.6e11 kg) within our atmosphere. One trustworthy method
of its natural plus artificial escapement is via natural gas that’s
never pure CH4 to begin with.
2012/2013 Global natural/raw gas extractions of roughly 129e12 cf =
3.65e12 m3 per year (US responsible for taking at least 20% of that,
mostly because of our oil refineries processing imported oil and
exporting their refined liquid hydrocarbon products and otherwise via
large scale gas turbines and boiler kinds of heat and power
generation, plus our having the world’s largest military industrial
complex that doesn’t always have to account for its all-inclusive
consumption nor environmental impact), is not necessarily including
those hydrocarbons required for global exploration and the ongoing
wellhead plus various pipeline and tanker transport related
consumptions, its necessary processing in order to rid this raw
natural gas feedstock of certain unworthy combustion and/or toxic
elements, plus taking into account for its vast redistribution related
consumptions, much less accounting for those raw oil and gas wellhead
flarings and just good old industry leakage, spillage and those peaky
mega-blowouts continually taking place, whereas if this were all
combined (including negative energy production) could easily increase
that global volume of raw gas extractions to at least 5e12 m3/yr,
whereas perhaps 75% of that (3.75e12 m3/yr) is the refined metered
consumption of CH4, of which the US takes a 7.6e11 m3 or 20% bite.
Wholesale extractions of crude oil from sand is offering a perfectly
good example of negative energy, whereas it’s taking more hydrocarbons
and creating a much greater carbon footprint via massive volumes of
consuming raw natural gas, plus demanding a few other forms of applied
energy, in order to forcibly excavate, transport and processing that
oily sand for its liquid hydrocarbon energy, that eventually becomes
consumer fuels. But that’s just another ongoing mainstream
obfuscation par for the course that has run itself out of most of
those other more affordable or cleaner options. Otherwise, I’ll
suggest that some of this bulk natural gas feedstock isn’t exactly
getting metered nor hardly processed, but instead directly consumed
for running local power plants or piped for other dedicated industrial
mass consumption, because most in Big Energy or heavy industry really
don’t care how extra nasty, toxic or less combustion efficient it is
(as long as it’s offering the cheapest energy alternative, such as its
current market trading under $2.40 per 1000 cf which only slightly
modifies our residential end-use 500% markup price that was always
artificially jacked up to begin with, not to mention those substantial
up-front investments by each commercial and residential client to
begin with, nor their added CO2, CO, NOx, fire and explosive risk
factors within your home, office, factories and schools).
60% efficient fuel-cells running off CH4 and/or H2 could totally
mitigate the residential natural gas related CO2, CO, NOx, fire and
those not so uncommon explosion risk factors, but otherwise those fuel-
cells are apparently too failsafe, operate too clean or even too
cheaply and potentially as carbon free when fueled by H2, and
obviously they’re rather efficient compared to other commercial energy
alternatives, thus most communities still don’t have that option but
otherwise get to pay nearly ten fold as much as they should for their
electrical grid energy.
The recently foiled OCO mission would have extensively identified and
quantified natural and artificial vapors of various elements, plus
mapping and quantifying any natural or artificial heat related issues,
to a sufficient global mapping detail of resolution that for the first
time we’d have some objective clues as to the extent of what humans
contribute in addition to whatever’s naturally taking place. So for
now and just to be on the safe all-inclusive estimate side of what
gross amount of hydrocarbon saturated gasses are taken out and/or
simply getting exposed from within and frequently allowed as
unrestricted to vent (2012 industry flaring/venting estimate 2e11 m3/
year), perhaps we should specify 1e13 m3/yr, because the metered and
unmetered world consumption of CH4(methane) is not ever the same thing
as what those volumes of raw wellhead feedstock and many other
artificially released volumes manage to contribute to our global
atmospheric environment, in addition to whatever occurs by natural
upwelling and geology osmosis or nanofiltration (after all, the thin
crust of Earth is nothing but a natural molecular sieve, along with
having thousands of significant big holes).
Typically our oil and gas wells can be worthy of 90+% CH4, but along
with including those gassy deep oil wells and various exposures via
mining plus extensive shale fracking could easily pull that well
average below 75% CH4, and some of that natural gas is actually quite
sour or acidic and corrosive by packing CO2 that’s entirely toxic to
begin with, plus it often includes greater than trace amounts of known
carcinogens and other toxins, including a small portion of radon gas
and perhaps averaging as great as 1% helium (mostly 4He plus extremely
little 3He) per given volume of this raw natural gas. BPs Prudhoe Bay
natural gas composition is only worth 76% CH4, 12% CO2 (acid gas), and
that percentage of CH4 will only degrade over time (for the moment
they only burn this raw feedstock locally for their own wellhead and
piping energy needs, and otherwise having to forcibly pump it back
underground in order to store it and help extract their $60+/barrel of
wellhead crude oil)
Natural gas at 1% 4He, and that’s only putting us within the ballpark
of releasing 1.8e10 kg of helium per year in addition to whatever is
naturally leaking out of Earth, and that’s only contributing another
5708 kg/sec to what nature likely has to spew or vent near that much
in order to sustain the 5.24 ppm (atomic) or .017 ppm per atmospheric
volume, which is no small accomplishment of natural 4He upwelling
leakage or diffusion all by itself. An atmospheric volume of 100 km x
5.2e14 m2 = 5.2e19 m3, and supposedly 1.7e-8 of that is 8.84e11 m3 of
4He = 1.6e11 kg that has to get replenished via 5073 kg/sec when based
upon an annual renewal basis, though its rate of renewal is probably a
somewhat greater.
That’s derived from a maximum diffusion and escapement rate as based
upon 1% 4He as found within natural gas, whereas a more conservative
0.1% per CH4 volume is still a very significant quantity of 4He
escapement (1.8e9 kg/year), and once again the OCO mission would have
made this task of quantifying so much easier and a whole lot more
objectively proven.
Geothermal and hydrothermal vents that happen to spew a great deal of
4He in spurts or waves of 11% concentration in regular geyser like
spurts or cycles is what has objectively proven that this element of
4He doesn’t exactly stick around or otherwise bind or cling with
anything in order to keep itself from leaving Earth.
http://www.geothermal-energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/WGC/2000/R0069.PDF
The unusual Nagqu W geothermal vent with its considerable 4He and
3He, is clearly suggesting a substantial nearby cache of radium. Even
the surrounding soil samples offer 100 ppm 4He that’s obviously
migrating as a constant upwelling or diffusion from deeper within.http://www.ija.csic.es/gt/ivone/ftp/Tibet/References/Hoke_et_al._EPSL...
Once raw helium gets released it probably can’t ever exceed .98 m/sec
unless there’s some artificial kinetic and/or thermodynamic energy
applied or it’s contained within a balloon that can exceed 4 m/sec
(faster than 5.5 m/sec with minimal payload), although for raw 4He
averaging just .01 m/sec = 1e7 seconds to reach 100 km, is only
taking .3171 year. In other words, an average vertical migration of .
0032 m/sec would take roughly one year to reach 100 km. However, due
to molecular turbulence caused by various atomic molecular
differentials of our atmospheric elements, whereas the typical
vertical migration rate of raw 4He within a sea level atmosphere,
managed to rise at up to .75 m/sec and otherwise averaging .65 m/sec,
has been objectively proven.
http://www.orau.gov/ssaa2012/presentations/Thursday%20AM%20Materials/...
http://endeavours.org/Events/BalloonFest2012/Documents/Balloon%20Rise...
In other words, there’s nothing of known physics that’s going to keep
that helium from leaving Earth, and perhaps taking a quicker exit than
one year to accomplish.
Perhaps all the natural plus our artificial release of helium could
exceed 10 tonnes/sec or amounting to only 5 tonnes/sec if the
atmospheric volume and its subsequent mass has been increasing,
however, unless that volume and the subsequent mass of our exosphere
has been measurably expanding (which it probably hasn’t), Earth is
losing mass.
However, helium plus a few other lofty elements (including H2 and our
O3/ozone) are leaving our world at that or somewhat greater rate due
to whatever the thermodynamics, molecular buoyancy and what solar wind
can manage to heat, accelerate and excavate away, and as for perhaps
blaming those increasing ozone holes on CFCs like freon-12/R12
(Difluorodichloromethane) was perhaps just another spendy oligarch FUD/
ruse in order to distract us and cover the fact that helium was always
insider known as the primary volumetric culprit, as well as to
otherwise greatly profit from those of us that could least afford to
pay. A mafia would call that a sting.
Difluorodichloromethane/R12 itself was essentially ozone inert because
the lower atmospheric concentrations of this molecular element wasn’t
ever capable of leaving our planet (any more so than Corexit or any
number of natural freons including CH4 can’t easily escape), but none
the less those opening ozone holes were always mainstream depicted as
intentionally quite scary and otherwise perfectly FUD worthy for
accommodating and promoting this FUD ruse of CFCs being the cause.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion
Or if you like to explicitly trust your government and their Oligarch
plus Semite friends to be always telling us the whole truth and
nothing but the truth, then in that always warm and fuzzy failsafe
case, you’re all set to go as is, and you should remain as a happy
camper to the very end, regardless of whatever anyone else has to
say. If any of that sounded condescending or derogatory, it was
purely intentional.
-
Without those volumes of much cheaper and better performing R12 plus a
few other disqualified CFCs (such as used for dry cleaning), those
polar ozone holes are still every bit as big and if anything looking
substantially worse than ever.
Atomic halogens do not auto-mutate, decay or otherwise magically
convert into helium or anything remotely close that that kind of low
molecular density. If anything depletes, displaces and/or dilutes
that protective ozone layer, it’s those considerable volumes of
natural plus artificially released helium that briefly lingers within
the colder regions of our upper atmosphere (aka polar regions) before
entirely leaving our world. As helium unavoidably migrates upwards
and the solar wind plus solar heating accelerates this process, it
tends to lubricate as well as draw or draft along with it some of the
O3(ozone), as though it’s somewhat acting as a molecular lubricant
because of its smaller radii and nothing directly or indirectly binds
with helium. From the efficient station-keeping and otherwise ideal
scientific location of our Earth-moon L1, this badly needed Earth
science of what’s leaving our planet could have been ideally
researched and fully quantified in addition to many other GW+AGW
factors getting better understood.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/environment/ozonefreon_fraud.htm
Clearly we have government agencies operating and continually
obfuscating under the controls of certain oligarchs, as financed by
the likes of Rothschilds, which gives Semites and certain others
special benefits by protecting their global markets. In my view these
public-funded agencies should be abolished and later collectively
restarted as run by those few we can trust, required to maintain at
least 50% independent research as having absolutely no ties to those
of Big Energy or Heavy Industry that extracts and consumes massive
volumes of hydrocarbons, because we obviously can’t trust these folks
and their financial backers to be telling us the whole truth and
nothing but the truth about their own all-inclusive carbon footprints.
Unlike lofty and/or flighty elements like hydrogen and especially
helium that doesn’t bind with anything (including itself), the
geothermal and artificial wellhead vented mass that’s radon isn’t ever
going away, and because of its atomic molecular density plus its
relatively short half-life decay process means that it’ll quickly
convert into lead (perfectly safe when kept deep underground, though
not so safe above ground or much less in the ground water that we have
to consume). Recent natural gas via fracking is greatly increasing
the metallicity toxins in our ground water, including radium and its
radon that’s potentially more lethal per mg than Polonium 210.
http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/jun252002/1423.pdf
The Bakreshwar site with its 4% He isn’t offering the highest Ra,
whereas the Swastik Burtu, Gangtok site being more than 12 fold
greater Ra is sitting on a pile of radium plus any number of other
fission elements (including thorium).
The old adage about our planet only gaining mass is a lot of
mainstream FUD suggesting 40~70e3 tonnes/yr, that’s a ruse continually
perpetrated upon us, as though it’s offering some objective truth,
though perhaps because it also covers a great many Big Energy butts.
One example of FUD in “Physics Forums” via contributor “DaveC426913”
cranked up that global influx tonnage to an impressive 160,000 tonnes/
year (5 kg/sec) without even vaguely cracking a smile or so much as
offering a smirk, by posting this “Michael Paine” link.
http://users.tpg.com.au/users/horsts/transpermia.html
Oddly our naked and physically dark plus paramagnetic basalt crusted
moon seems near 99.9% devoid of such physical influx, because via our
NASA/Apollo era it can’t even account for its own volumes of crater
displaced dust and impactor shards that are apparently quite few and
far between, as well as our Apollo guys with all of their “right
stuff” finding its surface as perfectly crystal dry, inert and rather
devoid of lose material plus otherwise of mostly soft and highly
monochromatic pastel grayish hues offering no significant metallicity
whatsoever (not even sodium), but oddly this was quite reflective to
the tune of 65+% for as far as their cameras and unfiltered lens could
record, and otherwise perfectly harmless as well as lacking any
significant local radiation and much less as hardly paramagnetic nor
was it getting illuminated by any UV saturation, X-rays nor even the
least bit gamma worthy, and as I’d previously noted there was not even
any significant hint of sodium (even though we’ve since discovered the
moon is actually surrounded by a substantial ionized cloud of sodium,
as well as being extensively UV illuminated plus reacting quite nicely
to X-rays and gamma). In other words, our NASA/Apollo era of moon
science doesn’t seem to add up, and none of their Kodak recoded
science can be trusted or much less independently forensic
substantiated.
The quantifying science of any hard objective numbers as to what sort
and volume of items on average contributes annually to the mass of
Earth is actually published in mainstream media and throughout
textbooks allover the place, and yet they seldom other than plagiarize
or copy-cat agree, perhaps because there is no actual objective
scientific accounting for this molecular influx, just like there’s
still no objective science pertaining to how long a m3 of raw/naked
ice placed in LEO or Earth-moon L1 space would last within such a hard
vacuum while illuminated via the 1 AU of solar influx.
Of course, once the lighter elements of our planet are depleted and/or
intentionally released to get taken away by the solar wind (GW and AGW
making that molecular exit process even more efficient), the ongoing
loss of mass will eventually have to revert to a collection or buildup
phase of gaining mass from the influx of dust, meteor rocks and those
heavier molecular particles, whereas dust and metallicity from those
hopefully few larger items like icy ELE asteroids, that which the
local thermodynamics plus aerodynamics of their buoyancy and our local
gravity can manage to forever hold onto. Ideally if nothing of
atmospheric gasses was any lighter than N2, we’d be all set for the
long-haul in spite of our protective geomagnetic force field that’s
failing us by .1%/year.
Here’s one somewhat recent research as to the loss of oxygen ions, and
it’s still ongoing because O3 and lighter elements simply don’t have
sufficient molecular mass to stick with the weak gravity of Earth
(especially at risk of outgoing when our sun is behaving ever so
http://thayer.dartmouth.edu/spacescience/wl/misc/Outflow/Seki%2001.pdf
Of no great surprise, without those CFCs and a few other NO FLY
molecules, it seems the ozone holes are as bad or worse than ever.
It’s as though we’re on a hydrocarbon binging roll, especially with
natural gas which unavoidably includes the release of those extra
volumes of helium, as though directly correlating to our global
exploiting of hydrocarbons and the releasing of those unwanted
elements. This is not to say that CFCs haven’t been a minor
contributing factor.
http://www.theozonehole.com/2011.htm
-
Are we running on fumes yet, or is it looking a tad bit worse?
Here’s a few optimistic researchers suggesting we got perhaps another
30 years worth of relatively cheap helium. In other words, peak-
helium may be a lot closer than we’ve been lead to believe, and after
that it’s going to seriously cost big bucks to fill up that party
balloon.http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/08/25/nobel-prize-winn...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1305386/Earths-helium-...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubbert_peak_theory
“Almost all helium on Earth is a result of radioactive decay of
uranium and thorium. Helium is extracted by fractional distillation
from natural gas, which contains up to 7% helium. The world's largest
helium-rich natural gas fields are found in the United States,
especially in the Hugoton and nearby gas fields in Kansas, Oklahoma,
and Texas. The extracted helium is stored underground in the National
Helium Reserve near Amarillo, Texas, the self-proclaimed "Helium
Capital of the World". Helium production is expected to decline along
with natural gas production in these areas.”
Actually, India seems to have way more than it’s fair share of
naturally vented helium, and its volumetric outflux from those natural
plus artificial geothermal vents is truly considerable, plus otherwise
extracted liquids including water wells and natural aquifers of ground
water caries or rather helps transport helium to the surface, in that
basically all liquid extractions and even solids of coal or hard-rock
excavations contributes to this artificial and thus accelerated
release of helium. So it’s not just a natural gas associated issue.
“Helium is the second-lightest chemical element in the Universe,
causing it to rise to the upper layers of Earth's atmosphere. Helium
atoms are so light that the Earth's gravity field is simply not strong
enough to trap helium in the atmosphere and it dissipates slowly into
space and is lost forever.”
Nowadays our Big Energy oligarch cartels and their very brown-nosed
associate mafia cabals of market insiders speculating us to death and/
or putting us into the nearest poor-house via global inflation that’s
directly hydrocarbon price related, are now into drilling and fracking
so wide and deep that most of what’s coming from their wells is
somewhat lower-grade or sour and otherwise increasingly toxic natural
gas, as having ever decreasing percentages of CH4(methane) which
requires increasing amounts of having to process before sending it on
its way to consumers. The energy demand for this kind of added
hydrocarbon exploitation and its processing is also increasing to the
point of negative energy and maximum pollution, not to mention its
unavoidable release of helium along with other elements they usually
care not to mention. Shale gas is essentially the most spendy source
of natural gas (much like oily sand is the most spendy and carbon
producing resource of crude oil), and its feedstock will involve the
most kinds of complex other elements that’ll have to get processed
out, whereas a good Big Energy policy is becoming “don’t ask, don’t
tell” (aka mum’s the word).
http://www.3legsresources.com/media/A%20guide%20to%20shale%20gas.pdf
The injected water is essentially toxic or at the very least
unsuitable for most all known forms of life (especially as it returns
to the surface), not to mention those heavy metallicity elements freed
by fracking that to go with the flow of any injected or as having
migrated into nearby groundwater. Gee whiz, what could possibly go
wrong?
Of course our public-funded mainstream oligarchs and their Rothschild
financers that always have wealth and authority over whomever we care
to elect or appoint, could care less how much this hydrocarbon binging
and helium loss fiasco could cost us or impact the environment by
polluting our above and below surface plus traumatizing whatever ocean
ecosystems, because they’ll never have to suffer or having to pay for
any of the negative consequences or least of all fret over global
inflation. Fortunately for mother nature, eventually those natural
reserves of helium will get depleted and only the gradual radioisotope
decay produced helium will be available (though spendy as hell), so
the amount of future mass loss should greatly subside, at least down
to some dull roar of supposedly making due with 3.2e6 kg/year (though
I’d argue its production via natural radioactive decay and internal
fission is worth 3.2e7 kg/year, because I believe that’s roughly what
it takes for sustaining 5.24 ppm based upon its annual replenishment),
that we can all learn from and/or adapt ourselves to live with much
less helium than 0.1% of the 3.2e8 kg/year that’ll likely be needed by
2020 (not to mention the considerably more nifty and valuable 3He),
that is unless WW3 and WW4 (fought mostly over those remaining
hydrocarbons) eliminates us first. Some research has been suggesting
an empty He tank within 30 years, although I’d stretch that one out to
at most 100 years because of new and improved technology that’ll get
utilized for exploiting and extracting it, and naturally it’ll get
real spendy because thus far we have nothing in physics for its
replacement. Of course, as is more than 99% of the artificially
accessible 4He has been systematically and systemically wasted, and
our “no child left behind” policy has created generations of K12s that
frankly don’t seem to have a clue as to how totally screwed they and
future generations are.
http://eolus.phys.northwestern.edu/CM_Theory_Group/Photos/Pages/QFS20...
Atmosphere deficient moons and asteroids would likely offer the most
concentrations of 3He, and some of those of sufficient metallicity
could even be creating their internal cache of 4He, and the planet
Mercury should offer a treasure trove of 3He in addition to its
considerable metallicity, whereas Venus with it terrifically
protective atmosphere of carbonated vapor may offer hardly any 3He.
-
So here’s the latest ongoing kicker in the mainstream butt of life as
we know it, in that only a few others (including myself) would dare to
suggest otherwise against this mainstream status quo, by having
suggested that our planet has actually been losing mass considerably
faster than whatever solar system and cosmic influx could possibly
contribute. Obviously the oligarchs and Rothschilds of Big Energy and
otherwise in charge of most public credit for financing our personal,
local and national debts, as such don’t seem to appreciate this
deductive interpretation of our planet losing mass. Sorry about that.
Do these mainstream Oligarchs and wise old Semites in charge of most
everything know what they’re doing to us and our global environment;
you can safely bet your bottom dollar they do understand those highly
profitable benefits and they understand those subsequent consequences
that the rest of us get to deal with, and our always having to pay for
no matters how many generations it takes. Is this a fair deal that we
and the next generations can afford to live with?
No doubt the innards of Earth has a lot more ongoing fission (perhaps
mostly via thorium), and thus we’ve got enough thorium, uranium and
radium offering more fission and decay produced heat plus helium than
most of us might care to accept (3.2e7 kg/yr), because it actually
takes quite a bit of 4He in order to sustain the 5.24 ppm of common
atmospheric concentration. Not so oddly, the very active geology of
Venus is also keeping up with replenishing those same continual solar
wind extracted elements, and yet it’s also cooling itself off at the
same time, while sustaining 12 ppm helium within its impressive
4.85e20 kg of a mostly CO2 atmosphere that’s offering 66 kg/m3 near
surface buoyancy, is by itself rather impressive for such a toasty
planet with a gravity of only 90.4% and offering loads of local
geothermal differentials to work with, but having no actual protective
geomagnetosphere other than solar wind generated, is why that solar
wind keeps taking atmospheric mass away from Venus as it cools off and
having to maintain those 12 ppm of 4He might demand an internal rate
of annual replenishment worth at least 1e9 kg/year.
http://syzygyastro.hubpages.com/hub/Understanding-Magnetism
The best interpretation of Venus lacking a geomagnetosphere is that
its iron core is simply too fluid, as perhaps hosting a lot more
thorium and uranium fission and/or it’s simply not as old as we
think. Either way that’s a darn good thing if one was seriously out
and about looking for the most accessible off-world resources (other
than our moon) to exploit for our needs, whereas at least a couple of
such needs are going to become those nifty elements of 4He and 3He as
our terrestrial cache slides well past peak-helium in the near
future. Of course at less than $6/m3 for the spot market of bulk
Grade-A(99.95% 4He) version isn’t all that spendy until the usual
distribution repackaging with its nominal 2000% (twenty fold) retail
markup gets us to pay $120/m3 (w/disposable tank), and otherwise we’re
talking of forking out only $1M/m3 for that of pure 3He is already
pushing the upper most market price so that only the rich and powerful
get access, and of course the rest of us are the ones that’ll always
get to pay for whatever these oligarchs care to spend our hard earned
loot on, because they’ll never have to spend, invest or otherwise risk
any of their unearned own loot.
Besides the physically dark surface of our naked moon hosting more
than its fair share of 3He (no doubt offering some internal
radioactive decay derived 4He), Venus should represent a true mother
lode of 4He in addition to a treasure trove of many other valuable
elements. This off-world cache of helium may initially be spendy as
hell to obtain, but so will terrestrial helium become a whole lot more
spendy as the dregs of hydrocarbons and internal radioactive decay
source simply isn’t capable of supplying 0.1% of our needs, could be
highly problematic.
The good news is that with a future of limited hydrocarbons and hardly
any spare helium to blow, those polar ozone holes should subside, thus
closing up and better protecting us from our sun that’s not exactly
behaving itself.
-
As we rapidly deplete our commercial stockpiles and continually vent
the internal cache of our natural gas and its helium within our
planet, it seems Venus actually has more helium(4He) than it knows
what to do with (it’s estimated that our moon can easily supply a
thousand years worth of 3He), and meanwhile our planet is clearly
about to run out of those before 2050, not to mention the ongoing
extractions of hydrocarbon isn't without further risk and spendy
consequences (including environmental and ecological disasters, wars,
pandemics, famine and the social/political demise of those less
fortunate or simply unable to bully their way along). Unfortunately,
it’s the primary job of our public media army of brown-nosed clowns
and FUD-masters to make this and any other independent investigative
research all go away, and they accomplish this job by topic/author
stalking and discrediting anyone that has any possible disagreements
or offers alternative science interpretations against those of the
mainstream status quo.
Guess what: NASA is now down to a pathetic fraction of what it could
have been, and to no surprise those Oligarch Rothschilds seem to like
it that way, because the last thing they want to see is private
enterprise going after the exploitation of off-world resources before
every last drop and cubic meter of their terrestrial resources are
pillaged and plundered for the highest price and drop of blood they
can squeeze out of us.
Our initial DARPA of Zionist Nazi Oligarchs and their Rothschild
bankers that supposedly got us safely to/from our moon, always think
everything is going perfectly fine and dandy, whereas even nowadays
those of DARPA are treated as extra special and always given public-
funded media hype whenever possible, so there’s never any need for
change or revisions, and otherwise it seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint anyway. So why change their system, should they risk being
voted out of office?
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
